A Supermodel Violated My Photo Copyright And It Has Spiraled Out Of Control

If Karlie Kloss had credited me when she posted my photo to Instagram, I would have received what amounts to major publicity and had publications contacting me directly to license the photo.
Publish date:
August 6, 2014
magazines, models, photography, Karlie Kloss, copyrights, supermodels

This post is something I’ve struggled with for months, and debated even writing.

Basically, the short version is Karlie Kloss improperly used one of my images. It showed up on her Instagram account last September, without credit. (Many of the images before and after mine are credited.)

As readers of my blog know, I shoot as a house photographer for Oscar de la Renta’s social media accounts and Pinterest page. On September 10, 2013 I took this photo of Karlie Kloss taking a "selfie” backstage at the SS14 Oscar de la Renta show:

No other photographers were in the makeup area at the time, guaranteeing this was an exclusive shot.

When I got home, I posted it as part of my daily “sneak peek” show recap.

The next night, backstage at the Anna Sui show, I approached Karlie and showed her the image on my phone. She seemed very excited, and mentioned how much she loved it. When she asked where she could find it, I gave her my business card with my blog’s address.

A few days later, Karlie Instagrammed the image, leaving out a photo credit.

Not knowing any other way to get in touch with her, I commented on Karlie’s Instagram hoping she’d see it in the sea of many many other comments. After a few days, she did, writing me an apology for not crediting me initially.

By that time, 14,000 people had liked the image. That’s 14,000 people who would have seen my name attached to it.

She also apologized a second time on my personal Instagram account:

Within a few hours, her comment/”credit” on her original instagram post was buried, made nearly invisible by her other fans’ comments.

At this point, I was sad so many (now it’s about 16,000+) people saw the image without my photo credit attached. But there wasn’t really much I could do.

In November, 2013, I ran into Karlie backstage at the Victoria’s Secret fashion show, and after bringing up the incident during our conversation, she apologized. I assumed that was the end of things.

In March of 2014, I got a text message from a friend. She was at the airport, reading Lucky, and spotted my Karlie Kloss photo in an article about selfies. I soon found the image on Lucky’s website as well.

After emailing Lucky, they reposted the image with credit, and compensated me for the usage.

In April 2014, the image appeared AGAIN on the Harper’s Bazaar website (in a nearly identical article, which was, in my opinion, strange, but whatever).

After a lot of emailing back and forth, my image was removed, and I was compensated for the original photo usage.

At this point, I was relieved to have settled the first two cases of improper image usage/copyright violation and ready to move on with my life. And then I found the image on dozens of other websites from around the world.

Plus countless other blogs, another professional photographer’s website, a stylist’s website, and more. There are over 19 pages of links for my photo when you do a reverse Google image search.

Unfortunately, this photo is never going to stop showing up online and throwing a wrench into my everyday life.

Last month, an eagle-eyed friend spied my photo, once again, in an article about taking selfies on Allure's website.

I am currently emailing back and forth with Allure editors, but needless to say, it’s not going well.

Why does any of this matter? After the drama involved in constantly policing my work’s usage and health issues, I considered giving up photography indefinitely. Or at least blogging about it. I’ve been shooting since I was 13 years old (which is now over half of my lifetime), and it’s been amazing to fulfill my dream of photographing some of the best designers and models in the world during the past five years of New York Fashion Week. I started to wonder what the point was. If I’m working my ass off, only to have people steal my images and run them in major publications uncredited or compensated, is it worth it?

I do the majority of my Fashion Week work on spec, meaning I get paid after the fact. No one is giving me hundreds of dollars to attend shows. I work alone, doing all of the requests, scheduling, planning, and post-show marketing and publicity myself. I make my income selling images (mostly backstage beauty) after the fact, and shooting editorials and portraits the rest of the year.

The sad thing is, this happens all the time. And the attitude amongst many magazine editors (many, not all) is that it’s OK to just say “oops, sorry” and delete the image. That’s not how copyright works. I worked as a photo editor for four years at multiple magazines in NYC. Had I implied that it was OK for me to use a photographer’s image without payment or credit, I probably would have been fired.

There are also plenty of celebrities and models who think using images without permission or even a credit on their blogs/websites/Instagram accounts is OK. It’s not. If this has happened to you, I encourage you to check out photoattorney.com for great advice. (And yes, before anyone asks me, I have contacted a lawyer.)

If I had been credited in the first place, I would have received what amounts to major publicity, and had publications contacting me directly to license the photo.

In the end, the fun fact of all of this is that right now, I’ve lost what amounts to hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars in image licensing fees thanks to one Instagram post. Add onto that potential legal fees, and it’s one giant headache that will probably be continuing on for months of my life.

All because Karlie Kloss used my photograph and neglected to credit me properly.

Reprinted with permission from The Greyest Ghost.